Understanding the asthmatic response to an experimental rhinovirus infection: Exploring the effects of blocking IgE.

BACKGROUND: Rhinovirus frequently causes asthma exacerbations among children and young adults who are allergic. The interaction between allergen and rhinovirus-induced symptoms and inflammation over time is unclear. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare the response to an experimental inoculation with rhinovirus-16 in allergic asthmatics with the response in healthy controls and to evaluate the effects of administrating omalizumab before and during the infection. METHODS: Two clinical trials were run in parallel. In one of these trials, the response to an experimental inoculation with rhinovirus-16 among asthmatics with high levels of total IgE was compared to the response in healthy controls. The other trial compared the effects of administering omalizumab versus placebo to asthmatics in a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled investigation. The primary outcome for both trials compared lower respiratory tract symptoms (LRTSs) between study groups over the first 4 days of infection. RESULTS: Frequent comparisons of symptoms, lung function, and blood eosinophil counts revealed differences that were more pronounced among allergic asthmatics than among controls by days 2 and 3 after virus inoculation. Additionally, an augmentation of upper respiratory tract symptom scores and LRTS scores occurred among the atopic asthmatics versus the controls during the resolution of symptoms (P < .01 for upper respiratory symptom tract scores and P < .001 for LRTS scores). The beneficial effects of administering omalizumab on reducing LRTSs and improving lung function were strongest over the first 4 days. CONCLUSIONS: LRTSs and blood eosinophil counts were augmented and lung function was reduced among allergic asthmatics early after rhinovirus inoculation but increased late in the infection during symptom resolution. The effect of administering omalizumab on the response to rhinovirus was most pronounced during the early/innate phase of the infection.

Statins for neuroprotection in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.

Statins, a common drug class for treatment of dyslipidemia, may be neuroprotective for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) by targeting secondary brain injury pathways in the surrounding brain parenchyma. Statin-mediated neuroprotection may stem from downregulation of mevalonate and its derivatives, targeting key cell signaling pathways that control proliferation, adhesion, migration, cytokine production, and reactive oxygen species generation. Preclinical studies have consistently demonstrated the neuroprotective and recovery enhancement effects of statins, including improved neurologic function, reduced cerebral edema, increased angiogenesis and neurogenesis, accelerated hematoma clearance, and decreased inflammatory cell infiltration. Retrospective clinical studies have reported reduced perihematomal edema, lower mortality rates, and improved functional outcomes in patients who were taking statins before ICH. Several clinical studies have also observed lower mortality rates and improved functional outcomes in patients who were continued or initiated on statins after ICH. Subgroup analysis of a previous randomized trial has raised concerns of a potentially elevated risk of recurrent ICH in patients with previous hemorrhagic stroke who are administered statins. However, most statin trials failed to show an association between statin use and increased hemorrhagic stroke risk. Variable statin dosing, statin use in the pre-ICH setting, and selection biases have limited rigorous investigation of the effects of statins on post-ICH outcomes. Future prospective trials are needed to investigate the association between statin use and outcomes in ICH.